Revisionism Revisited
Many have drawn a parallel between the week's events surrounding Michael Jackson's demise and the passing of Elvis Presley. I can see some faint shadows of overlap for a few reasons. Number one is the black-become-white metamorphosis which Elvis executed so effortlessly and seamlessly and quietly. The difference is he did it before he burst on the scene rather than after. And in reverse direction. I wish we could say Jackson's changes had been so well-conceived, well-carried out and well-received. That is assuming Jackson's pursuit had merit in the first place which it did not. Elvis drew from the musical outlaw repertoire of black performers, made it his own and ran with it. In doing so, he was the first and biggest crossover act in music history. To say he integrated black and white onto the dance floor might be a bit much; but with some help from Dick Clark and American Bandstand, the youth of the time did begin to look past race and accept each other more I think. How could anyone fault Elvis--or Dick Clark--for that?
How many of these same good things can be said about Jackson? Well, the times were quite different. Blacks had taken over Detroit studios and were putting out the Barry Gordy sound on millions of platters bought by listeners of both colors. White artists had broken away from the quaint Elvis sound in favor of Brit pop; thanks to Beatlemania. The two camps had managed to de-integrate and re-segregate the music business; perhaps unwittingly but still effectively. Into this fray burst the Jackson Five which as a child act could pass for acceptability to Ed Sullivan's white audience, but deep down they were of course black people albeit with an edge-less quality to their brand of soul. A country torn apart by Vietnam and race riots could handle a cute black kid with an Afro who sang white material.
As Michael grew up, he began to hone an edge to his act. Maybe he did believe that a hipper Gen-X legion of fans who emerged from the turbulence could embrace his blackness without giving any thought to the concept of race at all. Smart move. They did just that as the machine was now being driven by Quincy Jones and MTV at redline speed and selling billions of dollars worth of music. Up to this point, he had been doing some good for music and race relations both.
Why Jackson went wrong, how he went wrong and why no one helped him back to the right path are all moot points now. They became moot long ago as his perversions and delusions and confusion about his self identity played out in court and the media. Any hope of a looming "comeback" would be as credible as one attempted by someone who thought the time was ripe for a modern version of Amos 'n Andy. Who would pay huge money to see a pasty caricature of a mannequin with no heart or soul left in him?
I think the saddest part of these last few days is the racial divide which is again so evident. The grieving energy expended by white people was a fraction of that depicted in the media at least by black fans. Nearly 3/4 of black people felt the amount of coverage was proper while about the same percentage of whites felt it was excessive. If Brooke Shields had not gone before the cameras (with a much better tan than she usually displays) today, I submit the event might have been completely un-integrated. Oh wait: Jackson's white "children" were present so do they count? But wait: they don't have any of his DNA so are they "his?"
Number two on my list of similarities has to do with medicine as practiced so badly and so ineffectively by the medical profession who does a great deal of harm despite their lofty and broken promise. To blame the victim for getting addicted to pills is missing the mark. The companies making these compounds, the government that approves them, the doctors who push them and the insurance companies that keep the whole machine greased and spinning are the villains. The people they suck in and chew up and spit out are pitiable. And because Michael Jackson and Elvis Presley both got ground up in those blades, I feel sorry for them both. I just wish Michael could have built on Elvis' sociological ground breaking rather than turning it on its head. He would have left a much better legacy.
